Media cowards

Apparently they've decided to start treating Dr. Ron Paul as though he doesn't exist a bit earlier in the election cycle than they did 4 years ago. Why? Well, my guess is because if he won, his policies and ideas might slow down or stop the 'gravy train' they're riding on. Four years ago most news stories about Ron Paul began by stating that he 'has no chance of winning'. So of course, people who watch the t.v. news or read news stories begin to get that message (subliminal?), and when you talk to them about Dr. Paul they say things like 'I like him and I'd vote for him, but he has no chance of winning...'

In other words, they're basically saying 'I'm going to let the mainstream news organizations decide who can win and who I should vote for...' It's pathetic is what it is. My advise is: Vote for the best candidate! The lesser of 2 evils is still evil. And it wouldn't be the first time the 'experts' got it wrong.

I'll finish that rant for now, I wanted to share a link to a good story, as well as embed a video by Jon Stewart on this very topic. This sums up my feeling as well, from the article where I found this video: Jon Stewart continues to be my favorite liberal. Not because I like liberals—but because I respect honesty and integrity.

I learned a couple of things from this article by Doug Wead titled Ron Paul's Iowa success and the media cover up. Here's a paragraph, but do check out the whole article. It's not terribly long.

To give you an idea of how staggering Paul’s victory was, and why the national media risks a total disconnect with its readers and viewers in their effort to ignore it, he won twice as many votes as Tim Pawlenty and almost as many votes as Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Herman Cain, New Gingrich, Rick Santorum and Jon Huntsman combined.

I would think that would be quite news-worthy, but it was apparently ignored by the national media.

The Daily Show video below is just over 4 minutes.

The Daily Show
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

Government Lies 1

I wasn't sure what to call this post, so I thought 'Government Lies' was appropriate. But then I know it won't be the last time I want to use that title, so I'll just start numbering them. I just found this article on the Energy News site, and thought I'd link to the actual article. It's called Fukushima brings big radiation spikes to B.C. (Canada). Here's the kicker -- I remember shortly after the world heard about damage to the nuclear reactors (plural, not one reactor but 4 of the 6 are badly damaged), we were told by our government and the press that there was no need to worry. They reported that people were buying iodine pills, but there was no need for them. Not that they'd measured the amount of radiation or anything, but that even if there was a lot of radiation it would all dissipate (like magic?) by the time it made it's way across the Pacific Ocean. It turns out they lied. Whether it was out of ignorance or malice, I don't know. And now that the damage is mostly done we get news reports that tell us a revised story than what was originally told. And, as far as I can tell large amounts of radiation continue to be released from the plants. And that radiation is continuing to make it's way across the Pacific Ocean. (See updates for Jul 6 and June 23.) I am actually beginning to believe that if there is any 'man made global warming' or 'climate change' it is due to nuclear energy and NOT carbon emissions. Some people in the Energy News comment section place the blame on 'profits above people' which is mostly true. Then they blame capitalism, which to me isn't to blame. I would blame fraud, cover-ups and deception. It's not like the 'leaders' in a communist, socialist or Marxist system are any better.