Do you recognize this phrase: “…ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.“? If we must wait until we are in front of a judge to find out whether our conduct is conformed to the law, what is that telling us about the Code? If on a whim, an IRS agent can disallow our deductions 4-7 years after the fact resulting in a bunch of penalties and interest, what is that telling us about the Code? ...
What does the fact that there is a 50/50 chance of prevailing which depends upon who is sitting in the Court at the time your petition for cert arrives tell us about the Code, IRS, and the judiciary?
Highlighting the deception found between the U.S. income tax laws and their application; as well as other related articles thrown in for good measure.
Monday, November 19, 2012
Why don't attorneys help get IRS personnel prosecuted?
I just read an article that's a few years old, by someone I follow on Twitter, with the same title as this article. It fits in nicely with the topic of this blog, so I thought I'd link to it and quote a few sentences below.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Asleep at the wheel
I wanted to share an article I found on the Andrew Wommack Ministries website, titled: Christians: Citizens and Disciples. I chose the title 'Asleep at the wheel' because I believe that's what the Christian church has been. It boggles my mind sometimes, how much lies and fraud have increased in this country over the last 30 years or so.
I think part of the reason for that is because of the Reformed / Calvinistic world-view that seems to dominate in many areas, which says that 'nothing happens unless it's God's will'. I've written a little bit about that on my other blog.
Here are a couple of paragraphs from the article linked above, just to give you an idea what it's about:
Overall I think it's a very good article, with a good amount of historical quotes added to give context.
I think part of the reason for that is because of the Reformed / Calvinistic world-view that seems to dominate in many areas, which says that 'nothing happens unless it's God's will'. I've written a little bit about that on my other blog.
Here are a couple of paragraphs from the article linked above, just to give you an idea what it's about:
Yet, as a whole, the church responded by promoting political involvement as the answer to society’s woes. Make no mistake—Christians who live in a country that provides them the freedom to govern through voting or holding political office have a responsibility to participate. However, for many, politics has not been a weapon against the moral decline; it has been the only weapon.And
Our society isn’t sick because of the government; it’s sick because the church has not made faith in the teaching of the Bible “practically universal in our country.” Once we cease to win the hearts of man, it is inevitable that ungodly people will make their way into leadership and take the country with them.I somewhat disagree with the contention that the Government does nothing to form people's beliefs. I believe there is a faction that has done their level best to get their agenda into the public schools, which goes a long way to helping people form their beliefs. Not to mention government influence on the media, and vice versa.If we change people’s hearts with the Gospel, the people will change the government with their votes. Government merely reflects what people believe in their hearts; it does nothing to form those beliefs. William Penn, the founder of Pennsylvania, wrote in the late 1600s, “Government seems to me to be a part of religion itself…. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad.”
Overall I think it's a very good article, with a good amount of historical quotes added to give context.
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Jerry Day on the CAFR swindle
Here's a good video that runs about 15 minutes about the CAFR. If you're not familiar with the CAFR, visit here: http://cafr1.com/ or http://taxretirement.com/
Monday, September 24, 2012
Good article about Christians and Romans 13
When one tries to discuss the possibility that the government is over-reaching in their enforcement of the U.S. income tax, one will frequently run into people who will quote Romans 13, and say the 'higher powers' are ordained of God (because God is 'sovereign' after all, and nothing happens unless He allows it... or so they say). When I researched some of the language in those first few passages in the Strong's concordance, it seemed to me that the 'higher powers' referred to in those passages were those of a spiritual nature, and not mankind. Sort of like the commercials for Hebrew National hot dogs used to say something along the lines of 'we answer to a higher authority'.
So I just read a good article on another blog titled: Christian Indifference and Romans 13 that I wanted to mention here, it mentions many other biblical passages where obeying God meant going against the reigning authority. I did pick up some mis-spellings, but I still made it to the end of the article and liked the message. Check it out!
So I just read a good article on another blog titled: Christian Indifference and Romans 13 that I wanted to mention here, it mentions many other biblical passages where obeying God meant going against the reigning authority. I did pick up some mis-spellings, but I still made it to the end of the article and liked the message. Check it out!
Monday, March 12, 2012
Government Explained
This video is really funny, in a sick sort of way. It's about 9.5 minutes long.
http://youtu.be/EUS1m5MSt9k
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Was Ron Paul Robbed of ND Caucus win?
I just wanted to share this video here, it's about 4 1/2 mins.
http://youtu.be/KU0WB4C9b3w
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Google's new privacy policy
Apparently Google is changing their privacy policy to be able to better target ads across their various web site 'properties', including Gmail, YouTube, Maps and their search engine. Probably also their blogs, of which this is one. I haven't looked at the details, so my information is from this article from the Washington Post. The reason I decided to write a short blog post about it is because of this quote:
In addition, you don't have to stay logged in to YouTube all the time if you don't want. Or you can use a different browser for logging in to Google Maps. I realize that many people log in on their mobile devices, so a different browser may not be an option. Share your reactions and ideas in the comments if you'd like.
“There is no way anyone expected this,” said Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a privacy advocacy group. “There is no way a user can comprehend the implication of Google collecting across platforms for information about your health, political opinions and financial concerns.”Really? I actually thought they were already doing this, which is one reason why I've started using a different search engine, and in Google's favor at least they're not including their wallet in the sharing. I have to question the discernment of someone who can honestly say 'there is no way anyone expected this'. I fully expected it about 2 years ago.
In addition, you don't have to stay logged in to YouTube all the time if you don't want. Or you can use a different browser for logging in to Google Maps. I realize that many people log in on their mobile devices, so a different browser may not be an option. Share your reactions and ideas in the comments if you'd like.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)