Tom Woods video - Thought Controllers Call Ron Paul "Extreme"

I had only heard about Tom Woods about 2 or 3 months ago and have watched a few of his online videos. I think I'm a new fan! I wanted to share this video, it's a little over 26 minutes.

Newt Gingrich - Conservative or Wolf-in-sheep's-clothing?

I wanted to post a link to this blog post, since it has some very interesting information. I started leaning away from the Democrat party towards the Republican party right around the mid-1990's when Newt was Speaker of the House. (Bill Clinton and the press reaction to Monica Lewinsky and related issues was, to me, so disgusting I couldn't stomach being a Democrat any more.) I did notice with Mr. Gingrich that the actions didn't quite match the rhetoric.

Here are a couple of paragraphs from the article, but it's definitely worth reading the whole thing.

Newt Gingrich wrote in many of his official bio’s for conservative causes that his degree was in “history.” In actuality, it was in the New Age full employment program of “Environmental Studies.” In the mid 1980s, Mark Satin, author of NEW AGE POLITICS and NEW OPTIONS newsletter gave “Internationalist” rankings for Congressmen. Heading the list with the best “internationalist” voting records in Congress were Newt Gingrich and Marci Kapteyn, a Congresswoman from Toledo, Ohio.

Another interesting analysis of Newt Gingrich appeared in a 1986 edition of the Los Angeles Times. It noted how he was most likely a left leaner, but learned that the right got the votes. Ergo, he suddenly veered course to the right. That analysis troubles me more than the Alvin Toffler, Heidi Toffler, Environmental Studies analyses which are a red flag of New Age danger in and of themselves.. It suggests a man who is more amoral than immoral. Such a person to my way of thinking is most dangerous of all – he does nothing from conviction or reason, but does all from a analysis of personal advantage.

Nuclear mayhem

I've been keeping up with news about the earthquake and resulting nuclear disaster in Japan last month, and now a month later it doesn't look good. There's been next to no information from the 'public health' authorities, so it appears we're on our own, for the most part. I don't see how on earth we can claim some justification for sending bombers into Libya, but stay 'hands-off' with Japan's disaster when the weather patterns are sending nuclear radiation all around the northern hemisphere, landing first on the U.S. west coast (where I happen to live). Thankfully I have a Savior, but that's more of a topic for my other blog. I have never been a fan of nuclear power, and while it may be 'clean' when everything is working without problems, we do not now and never will live in a 'problem-free' world. Now that I'm done ranting, I wanted to link to an article titled: Nuclear's green cheerleaders forget Chernobyl at our peril. Here's a few sentences I wanted to highlight:

The authorities reassure us by saying there is no immediate danger and a few absolutist environmentalists obsessed with nuclear power because of the urgency to limit emissions repeat the industry mantra that only a few people died at Chernobyl – the worst nuclear accident in history. Those who disagree are smeared and put in the same camp as climate change deniers. I prefer the words of Alexey Yablokov, member of the Russian academy of sciences, and adviser to President Gorbachev at the time of Chernobyl: "When you hear 'no immediate danger' [from nuclear radiation] then you should run away as far and as fast as you can."

The author of the article then goes into some details about a trip he made to the still highly contaminated areas of Ukraine and the Belarus border 5 years ago. In general, it highlights with some detail that the 'official numbers' of those affected by Chernobyl is grossly understated. Definitely worth reading.

TheTinyDot video

Below is a video by Larken Rose, it's just under 7 minutes. The conclusions he makes can be applied to other areas besides taxes (such as health care, etc.). I thought it was funny and sadly very true at the same time.

Dr. Ron Paul and national security

I was just reading this article about the YAF national board expelling Dr. Ron Paul from their advisory board, and all I can say is: Wow!

For those who don't know my views, back in 2008 I spent some time volunteering for Dr. Paul's primary campaign for President and posted some articles and embedded a couple of YouTube video's on my other blog. Basically, he's as pro-U.S. Constitution as any politician you'll find. So for them to claim that he's not is just ridiculous. When it comes to war and national defense, from what I've heard him say he (rightly) says that we shouldn't be sending our citizens into battle unless we follow the Constitution and Congress votes for a declaration of war.

And otherwise he would follow a non-interventionist foreign policy. However he would secure our borders, which is rightfully a government function. He would cut foreign aid (and that topic pulls in the US AID agency, which I have discovered ties into the deception of the application of the tax code in a big way, but I digress...), as it's not a legitimate government function under the Constitution.

I think these few sentences sums up their reasoning:

The United States is the world's leader--a beacon of light for the wretched and the oppressed. God has blessed the United States with liberty and the strength and heart to spread that liberty to all of his children. Rep. Paul has abandoned this mission, abandoned the United States' citizens, and abandoned the citizens of the world in their quest for their God-given natural rights."

From what I gather from that statement, they expelled him because he's supposed to assist the citizens of the world in their quest for their God-given natural rights? Really? Is that what he took an oath to do? And who gets to decide how that is supposed to be accomplished? Wow.

Rich take from the poor

I wanted to point to an article on another blog I visit now & then since it really makes me angry. If you can afford to buy off some politicians apparently it's easy to 'game the system' and guess who pays for it? Here's the link to the article: Rich take from poor.

Welcome to the Tax honesy blog

I have another blog about using EFT and spiritual warfare, which didn't seem like the right place to post some of the things I'd like to rant or write about related to taxes and/or politics.

I had been thinking about starting a blog on this topic for at least the last couple of months, and due to the nature of the tax-collectors and their 'friends', I wasn't sure if perhaps it might be safer to be anonymous. I decided that while it might be 'safer' in some respects I didn't want to stoop to their level. What made me decide to start the blog now was that I saw an article on Rose Lear's blog that I wanted to link to, and didn't want to put it on my other blog, and that will be the 2nd post on here.

I don't know if I'll post a lot on here or not, but I'll throw up some links to other sites and probably comment about books I read and some online radio shows I listen to now and then. So, welcome to the blog!